BACK TO LIST OF ARCHIVED PUBLICATIONS

OVER THE STALL DOOR
Editorial: GRADUATING UP
by Candace Brown

Originally published in the 1999 ICAA ANNUAL REPORT

 

The other day on the internet I read someone's comment about the number of sport horse people who started out on Appaloosas, but "graduated up" to a Warmblood. Over the past several years, I have run into a number of folks who admit to having started out with an Appaloosa, but "moved up" to a Hanovarian, Thoroughbred, or Quarter Horse. This concept has been niggling at me. I do have difficulty with the concept that the Appaloosa is somehow lacking, that it needs "graduating from."

I have been mulling this over, trying to decipher the factors that might play into why people move away from the Appaloosa breed. I think I finally have a handle on it: we are doing it to ourselves. You, me, and the Appaloosa breeder down the road are all playing our parts in the sabotage of the Appaloosa.

First, industry-wide, we are an apologetic bunch. I rarely see anyone standing tall and proud, proclaiming, "He's an Appaloosa!" with the same enthusiasm one hears the Dressage Queens use when identifying their European Warmbloods. Instead we kind of duck our heads, shuffle our feet a little in the dust, and say, "Eh, he's an App." We don't even say "Appaloosa;" we say "App" or "Appy." (Come on, you don't hear the Quarter Horse folks referring to their beloved breed as "Quarts," nor do those Dressage Queens call their steeds "EWarms.") Others' horses merit full breed recognition. Why must we, within our own chosen breed, belittle them?

Along the same lines, we accept the phraseology of "improvement stallion" when referring to another breed covering an Appaloosa mare, or "improvement mare" when the Appaloosa stallion covers another breed. The Appaloosa is a perfectly good breed in and of itself. The intent of planned cross-breeding is to produce some type of specialty horse. I propose that each of us, upon hearing the term "improvement" applied to the other breed, gently correct the situation by saying something like, "Oh, you mean a 'specialty stallion/mare.' Yes, that pairing would make a good cross-bred." And then, taking that one step further, when referring to the resulting cross-bred foal, giving it full breed recognition for the strengths of both breeds: Appaloosa/Arabian cross, Appaloosa/Thoroughbred cross, Appaloosa/Quarter Horse cross.
Second, we undervalue our Appaloosas. If we look at the number of ICAA F-3's and F-4's available, there are less than 150 known to this organization. That means that out of the vast number of horses existing in the world (of all breeds), only 150 of them have highly concentrated Appaloosa genetics. That makes them pretty rare. There are more Lipizzaners in the United States than there are F-3 and F-4 Appaloosas, and the Lipizzaner is considered a rare breed! So what do I see us Appaloosa folks doing? Sticking a price tag that suggests commonality on our unique and rare sale horses.

I see nothing wrong with a horse being affordable. One person recently referred to the Appaloosa as the "American Warmblood that's easy to ride and easy on the pocketbook." But I believe the terms "affordable" and "cheap" are not interchangeable.

I read somewhere that a person buying a horse is not buying a horse, but buying a dream. When our asking prices for our genetically strong Appaloosas reflect the general pricing for the broad spectrum Appaloosa cross-breds, we not only minimize the inherent value of our Appaloosas, but we discount the dreams of the buying public.

One additional point is that we seem generally befuddled about promoting and marketing our special breed. Because we are dealing with a rarity, we suffer an ill-defined market. On one hand, our market is limited because our potent Appaloosa does not fit traditional molds like other breeds do (e.g., Thoroughbreds for racing, Arabians for endurance, Clydesdales for pulling beer wagons). Our Appaloosas do not compete well against the Appaloosa cross-bred horses in the "breed" shows, due in some measure to the prevalence of judges who appreciate Quarter Horse conformation and movement. So we have little success selling to the existing "breed" market, and we don't have the benefit of an identifiable discipline on which to focus.
On the other hand, our talented Appaloosas are capable of high levels of performance in many realms, creating a limitless market. Once we embrace this concept—that our horse is both worthy and able to compete against any breed, in a vast array of disciplines—and we honor our Appaloosas with enthusiasm and pride, our forays into the Open Show world will win converts.

The re-emerging Appaloosa is proving to be an extraordinary creature. We know this. It's time we let the other people in the horse world learn it. It's time we get out there and show them what our Appaloosas are made of. I believe we will then see people "graduating up" to the Appaloosa.